Saturday, May 23, 2020
Erik Erikson s Stages Of Development - 1608 Words
The Psychosocial Development The View on Erik H. Erikson s Stages of Development Frank Phan Cosumnes River College Psychology 300 Abstract This paper will touch over the aspects of Erik H Erickson s eight stages and how they affect everyday lives from infancy to adulthood. The paper will go over the approximate ages and the psychosocial crisis that they will eventually come to. Neglecting a child can lead to a cause of mental negligence in the form of Arrested Development. Within different cultural backgrounds, this paper will focus on the relationship of the infant and the mother, and the stresses and trauma they may or may not have to discuss about a future development. The biography of Erik Erikson Who exactly was Erik Erikson? Erik Erikson (1902-1994) was an art teacher who became a psychoanalyst working with a person named, Anna Freud. Erikson was a psychologist known for his psychological theory on human beings. Erikson trained as a Freudian psychoanalyst but believed that social interaction was more important than Sigmund Freud s psychosexual development. (Pearson 251). The word psych relates to the brain and the thinking into the mind, and the word social relates to the way that the mind racks with those around us in the public. So what is psychosocial really? Psychosocial is defined as the psychological development of the individual in relation to his or her social environment.(Pearson 251) These eight stages (left column going down)Show MoreRelatedErik Erikson s Stages Of Psychosocial Development1695 Words à |à 7 Pages Erik Erikson was born in Frankfurt,, Germany, in 1902. He was raised by his mother and stepfather and never knew his biological father. Throughout his life he struggled with his identity and felt that his stepfather never fully accepted him. After meeting Anna Freud the daughter of Sigmund Freud in Vienna, he decided to pursue a career in psychoanalysis. He received a diploma from the Vienna Psychoanalytic Institute however he never received a formal degree all of his knowledge was based on hisRead MoreThe Vital Stage of Every Student: Erik Eriksonà ´s Stages of Development 815 Words à |à 4 Pagesold. Erik Erikson has developed a theory broken down into several different stages representing different stages of a persons life, and one of his stages is directly associated with the age of children who enter the school scene for the first time. This stage is commonly referred to as Industry Vs. Inferiority. Research has proven that this stage in childrenââ¬â¢s lives is a crit ical stage that will determine how they look at themselves and others for many years to come. Eriksonââ¬â¢s fourth stage of personalityRead MoreErik Erikson s Stages Of Psychosocial Development891 Words à |à 4 Pagespeople still treat you like a child. Since high school, Iââ¬â¢ve been interested in psychology, a topic many people engage in because as humans, we all naturally try to learn more about ourselves as a whole, but also as individuals. Erik Eriksonââ¬â¢s stages of psychosocial development mark the eight points people go through from infancy to elder hood. Based on Eriksonââ¬â¢s theory, twenty year olds are at the end of adolescence where we wonder who we are and what we can be, as well as being at the beginning ofRead MoreErik Erikson s Stages Of Psychosocial Development953 Words à |à 4 Pagesthird of eight parts to Erik Eriksonââ¬â¢s stages of psychosocial development. Erikson states that we progress through these eight stages of development in a fixed order with each stage involving a crucial event or predicament that must be overcome in order to progress to the proceeding stage. This event takes place during a critical period within the individualââ¬â¢s development, thus if it is negatively resolved then it will prevent optimal development into the following stages however if it is positivelyRead MoreErik Erikson s Stages Of Psychosocial Development1318 Words à |à 6 Pagesbe discussing is Erik Eriksonââ¬â¢s ââ¬ËStages of Psychosocial developmentââ¬â¢ theory and Diana Baumrinds ââ¬ËParenting Stylesââ¬â¢. Stages of Psychosocial development Erik Eriksonââ¬â¢s theory emphasizes the search for identity during the adolescent years (Feldman, 2013). His ideas were greatly influenced by Freud, going along with Freudââ¬â¢s (1923) theory regarding the structure and topography of personality (McLeod, 2008). Eriksonââ¬â¢s theory is broken down into eight different stages. The first stage is ââ¬ËTrust-vs.-mistrustââ¬â¢Read MoreErik Erikson s Stages Of Psychosocial Development1756 Words à |à 8 PagesCurrent Developmental Stage: According to Erik Eriksonââ¬â¢s stages of psychosocial development, Neveah is in middle adolescence, which is focused on the conflict of identity verses role confusion (Ashford LeCroy, 2010). The developmental characteristics of middle adolescents include sexual identity, role experimentation, moral development, and self-discovery (Ashford LeCroy, 2010). Adolescents are evaluating how they fit into society and more specifically their social sphere. During this time,Read MoreErik Erikson s Stages Of Human Development1790 Words à |à 8 PagesErik Erikson is most famously known for his eight stages of human development. As a former student of Freud, Erikson was interested in the going ons of early childhood development and what the outcomes can be. With such an interest came his eight stages, each with a positive outcome and a negative outcome, depending on the environment in which the individual develops. The first five stages are the ones that are dependent a lot on how a paren t reacts with their child, considering it covers the firstRead MoreErik Erikson s Social Stages Of Development1080 Words à |à 5 PagesErik Erikson was born in Germany to a Danish mother and three years later, a German stepfather. He never knew his real father from Denmark. Growing up in Germany in a Jewish environment was sometimes difficult for him because of his Nordic features among his brown eyes, brown haired peers. Erikson was largely influenced by Sigmund Freud and expanded upon his Human Development theory with his own, the Psych-Social Stages of Development. Erikson moved to America in 1933 with his family to Boston, becomingRead MoreDevelopmental Psychologist Erik Erikson s Stages Of Psychosocial Development1729 Words à |à 7 PagesDevelopmental psychologist Erik Erikson changed the way that people viewed the psychosocial development in humans throughout their lifespan. Using the foundation provided by Freudââ¬â¢s psychosexual stages, he modified the concepts to wh ere they demonstrated external impacts on development as well as making it more about emotional conflicts than necessarily physical drives. This eight-stage theory is sequential, and requires the person to overcome conflicts in each stage to become a productive memberRead MoreCognitive Development And Erik Erikson s 8 Stages Of Psychosocial Development1788 Words à |à 8 Pages Jean Piagetââ¬â¢s 4 stages of Cognitive Development and Erik Eriksonââ¬â¢s 8 stages of Psychosocial Development Developmental is understood as the act or process of developing; progress such as child developmental. When children go through the process of developing, they all develop the same regardless of what state or country there from. The way children develop has been studied by two psychologistsââ¬â¢ name Jean Piaget and Erik Erikson and they both develop a theory of how children develop
Tuesday, May 12, 2020
Analysis Of Proto-Feminism In The Awakening By Kate Chopin
Proto-Feminism is defined as a philosophical idea in which feminism existed in a time period it was expected to be unknown. Before the 20th century, womenââ¬â¢s liberation was not a familiar concept to society, however a great variety of literature from this time period displayed how women defended themselves for the independence and freedom they lacked. Along with the many novels written in this time period, The Awakening written by Kate Chopin in 1899 justifies this philosophy. Edna Pontellier, the protagonist of the story took on the challenge of isolating herself from societal norms and proving her capabilities as a woman in a community of Creoles. Despite the fact that she managed to take control of her own life towards the end of theâ⬠¦show more contentâ⬠¦Edna, who was not very fond of motherhood decided she should not have to give up who she is for her family even though society expected this from her. Along with standing up for herself against family and society, she also stood up for her capabilities as an individual. This was portrayed when she made the goal of swimming out far from shore at Grand Isle. Although this does not seem to be very imposing in modern society, er accomplishment was influential in that time period as women were not expected to have such aspirations or skills. Edna however infringed this expectation, ââ¬Å"A feeling of exultation overtook her, as if some power of significant import had been given her to control the working of her body and her soul. She grew daring and reckless, overestimating her strength. She wanted to swim far out, where no woman had swum beforeâ⬠(10. 7). This portrays how the novel is a Proto-Feminist novel, as the main character fought against what society anticipates from her as a female individual. As Edna became awakened to more throughout the novel, she began taking even more risks when it came to the choices she made a s an individual, regarding what was acceptable to society. Towards the end of The Awakening, Edna took the choice of no longer allowing her husband to control her, or treat her as a possession, I am no longer one
Wednesday, May 6, 2020
History Harley Davidson Free Essays
In 1903, William Harley-Davidson, Arthur Davidson, Williams Davidson, and Walter Davidson started Harley-Davidson in a 10Ãâ"15 shed in their backyard in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Production started with three motorcycles in 1903 and increased to 8 in 1908. In 1969, AMF Incorporated acquired Harley-Davidson Motor Company and expanded capacity from 15,000 to 40,000 motorcycles. We will write a custom essay sample on History Harley Davidson or any similar topic only for you Order Now Harley-Davidson, Incorporated was formed in 1981, when it was purchased from AMF Incorporated in a management buyout. In 1986, Harley-Davidson, Incorporated became a publicly held company. The new management installed a just-in-time inventory system to reduce inventories and improve total quality. With a new quality focus Harley-Davidson began to invest heavily in research and development. In one year the new Harley-Davidson management reduced the break-even point by 18,000 motorcycles. Managementââ¬â¢s focus on efficiency in production and improvements in quality resulted in increased demand and a production capacity of 100,000 motorcycles in 1995. Harley-Davidson operates in two segments Motorcycles and Related Products, and Transportation and vehicles segment. Total net sales for the first nine months of 95 were $1.3 billion, an increase of $174.1 million from the first nine months of 1994. Net sales increased in both the Motorcycles segment and the Transportation Vehicles segment. Demand for motorcycles is continuing to increase at a rate faster than supply for most of the markets in which Harley-Davidson competes. Parts and Accessories market should grow at a rate similar to the annual growth in motorcycle market. From its beginning in a shed at turn of the century, Harley-Davidson has survived the Great Depression, two world wars and a manufacturing revolution to become a company with products so valued and sought after that they are a way of life for many owners (Wheelen). Organizationâ⬠s Vision, Mission, and Objectives The Harley-Davidsonââ¬â¢s vision is as follows: ââ¬Å"Harley-Davidson, Incorporated, is an action-oriented, international company-a leader in its commitment to continuously improve the quality of profitable relationships with stakeholders (customers, dealers, employees, suppliers, shareholders, government, and society). Harley-Davidson believes the key to success is to balance stakeholdersââ¬â¢ interests through the empowerment of all employees to focus on value-added activities.â⬠Harley-Davidsonââ¬â¢s mission statement is as follows; ââ¬Å"We fulfill dreams through the experience of motorcycling, by providing to motorcyclists and to the general public an expanding line of motorcycles and branded products and services in selected market segmentsâ⬠(Harley-Davidson Home Page). The mission statement shows that the focus of the organization is on customer satisfaction and growth. Harley-Davidsonââ¬â¢s statement of company philosophy contains a separate list of the values of the organization. The values listed in this statement are, ââ¬Å"Tell the Truth, Be Fair, Keep your Promises, Respect the Individual, Encourage Intellectual Curiosityâ⬠(Values). The objectives of the both the Motorcycle and Transportation Segments are listed below: à · Double production capacity to 200,000 motorcycles annually by 2003. à · Increase the number of women who purchase motorcycle-riding apparel. à · Gain entry in to the performance motorcycle industry and increase the sales of the newly acquired Buell Motorcycle Company. à · Increase international market share by increasing the number of foreign dealers and improving the foreign channels of distribution. à · Increase the availability of credit and lower the cost of credit for both the retail customer and the Harley Davidson Dealer. à · Improve customer satisfaction and improve communication with European stakeholders by increasing dealer service competencies. Mr. Richard Teerlink age 59 joined Harley-Davidson in 1981 and was elected to the board of directors in 1982. In 1988 he was appointed President, and he was named Chief Executive Officer in 1989 (Wheelen). Mr. Teerlink is also on the Boards of Directors of Johnson Controls, Incorporated and Snap-On Incorporated (Rethinking Leadership). Mr. Teerlink has been the leader in developing a value-based culture at Harley. His focus is on the importance of establishing mutually beneficial relationships with all of stakeholders has served the company well in the past. Teeklink believes that top management is responsible for creating an operating environment that can allow continual learning (Harley Davidson Home Page). Unlike the traditional executive leader who is focused on structure and strategy, Teerlink thinks about the operating environment in less tangible ways. Teeklink has a quality focus and has initiated a just in time inventory system along with a value-added approach to manufacturing (Wheelen). In addition to the focus on a quality product, Teeklink is also focused on growth and corporate governance, which is reflected in the companyâ⬠s vision. In a speech at Yale University Teerlink said that, ââ¬Å"the Motor Company expects its market share to be bolstered by increased production in the next few years. Teerlink stated the company expects to produce 200,000 units annually by the year 2003, compared to about 100,000 in 1995. Teerlink added in his speech, ââ¬Å"We have not found any reduction in the demand for Harley-Davidson,â⬠. He said the Milwaukee firm had close to 50 percent of the 651cc-and-above U.S. motorcycle market. Teerlink also said that almost 30 percent of the companyââ¬â¢s motorcycles are traditionally sold outside the United States. ââ¬Å"Harley-Davidson seeks a patient and careful approach to overseas expansion. Itââ¬â¢s our intention to be very successful in all markets,â⬠Teerlink added. ââ¬Å"We are taking time to develop markets, rather than just going in and putting a dealer on every corner and have them sell motorcycles. Because weââ¬â¢re capacity-constrained, weââ¬â¢ve been losing some market share, but weââ¬â¢re not losing market share because people donââ¬â¢t want to buy our product.â⬠According to Teerlink, Harley-Davidson now has distributors in Peru, Singapore, Indonesia, South Africa and other emerging markets. He said Harley-Davidson had no immediate plans to diversify beyond its traditional strength in large-displacement motorcycles. Teerlink also noted that women now make up about eight percent of new Harley-Davidson buyers, as opposed to only two percent in the past (Online Magazine). How to cite History Harley Davidson, Essay examples
Friday, May 1, 2020
Epidemiology Delivery Health Care Services ââ¬Myassignmenthelp.Com
Question: Discuss About The Epidemiology Delivery Health Care Services? Answer: Introducation The purpose of the Evaluation Plan is to provide the Accountable Officer (ADG or DDG) with a detailed project plan identifying all resources, milestones and deliverables. It should build on the broad information from the Evaluation Proposal and detail how the evaluation will be managed to deliver the report on time and on budget. The Commonwealth of Australia provides welfare payment for those job seekers who have not yet got any job to make their living. With the welfare payment there are many people who are utilising this money to engage in drug abuse and hence the authority has decided to apply a drug trial to prevent the welfare payments being used as fund the drug addiction of the people getting the welfare. It is important to note that the program is implemented in order to make sure the welfare payments are used in the right way for the welfare of the job seekers in the country and help them develop their professional status (Taylor et al., 2013). (Select which is applicable. Include a description of the project/program/initiative and its objectives) Purpose of the Evaluation The purpose of the evaluation is to focus on implementing the drug test trial and understand the number of people who are addicted to drug abuse and pick them. After the evaluation being done the accountable officer will be able to decide whether the drug test trial have been able to succeed in picking the people who are addicted to drugs and using the welfare payments for drug abuse. Hence the evaluation will show the number of people testing positive with drugs which would help to put them in the rehabilitation and bring them back to mainstream life and encourage them to receive proper counselling and treatment (Luce and Elixhauser, 2012). (Why is the evaluation being done? i.e., what should the Accountable Officer be able to decide as a result of the evaluation?) Scope for the Evaluation The scope for evaluation of the project involves evaluating the drug and alcohol abuse of the young people who are out of job and are receiving welfare payment from the Government. Around 5000 people will be involved in the drug testing trial. The drug testing trial application would help to improve the possibilities of streamlining the service properly (Kris-Etherton et al., 2014).(What aspects of the project/program/initiative are to be evaluated?) Inclusions (What does the evaluation include?) Exclusions (What does the evaluation exclude?) The evaluation will include drug test trial for people living under welfare payments. This will not include everyone using drugs but only those who are living under welfare payment. The evaluation is mainly done to improve the welfare payment system. It will exclude any kind of study that is not related to drug trial of the people living under welfare payment. (Insert additional rows as necessary) Core Evaluation Questions (List the approved evaluation questions the evaluation should answer to aid decision-making.) In fulfilling the purposes of the evaluation, the following core questions were addressed: How many people from the given populace are addicted to drug and alcohol? Is the evaluation program effective enough to get suitable result? Does the time duration kept for the evaluation suitable for the study? Evaluation Stakeholders The stakeholder evaluation is an extremely important aspect in the evaluation program. Stakeholders are the people who are directly related to the positives and negatives of the process. The stakeholder evaluation is important as the important stakeholders involved with the procedure could be identified through this (Dusetzina et al., 2012). The key stakeholders in this present evaluation program are the government, the job seekers living under welfare payment, the organisation doing the drug test trials and the tax payers who contribute to the welfare department through their money paid in the form of tax. Finally the rehab partners are strong stakeholder who has a fair bit of work to do as the healthcare partner for the Government. These stakeholders are extremely important for the success of this evaluation program as all of them play an important role in the completion of the present evaluation program that is the drug test trial of the people living under welfare payments (Jones et al., 2013). The stakeholders are extremely important for the project and they have significant interest in this project of drug test trial. In a healthcare program like this there are number of key stakeholders who are involved in the program. Stakeholder evaluation helps in understanding for which groups of people the evaluation program is developed and how they are going to use the evaluation results. The stakeholders who are involved (List the key stakeholders the evaluation is designed for and how they will use the findingstt Audience (Who are the audiences for the information from the evaluation? e.g., students, teachers, management, staff, partners, etc.) How evaluation findings will be used (How can they apply new knowledge from the evaluation study?) Staffs of the Welfare payment department They will use the evaluation to manage the account of the people living under the welfare payment. Healthcare partners They are extremely important and will use the evaluation findings to strategise their overall healthcare intervention plan for the rehabilitation project. (Insert additional rows as necessary) Evaluation Management Structure The evaluation management structure will be very simple and effective which would help to get easy access to the different levels of the management during the evaluation procedure. The evaluation management structure will be simple hierarchical with the director on top and auditors and evaluators working under the different level management teams so that the results could be effectively communicated to the different levels of the evaluation team and could be used accordingly for the effective completion of the healthcare evaluation program. Hence it could be said that the key decision makers in the system are the director of the evaluation team and the other heads of the stakeholder groups (Oleske, 2014). (List the key decision makers responsible for the evaluation.) Reporting Requirements Date Report type Writer/s Audience The submission date of the report will be on the 1st of January 2020. (Specify the submission date of the report) Two different types of report will be submitted one a progress report that will be submitted at regular intervals within these two years and the other is the final evaluation report which would be completed by the end of two years. (Specify the report type, i.e., progress report, interim report, final report) The Accountable officer of the evaluation team. (Identify the officer/s writing the report) Welfare Payment Department.(Identify the stakeholder/ audience for the report, e.g., Minister, Policy and Performance Committee, Evaluation Steering Committee, external stakeholders, etc) Submission of the progress report every six months and the final report on 3rd January 2020. The progress reports and final report will be submitted. The Head of the Evaluation team. The Healthcare partners. Final report on 2nd January 2020 The final report will be sent. The Director of the Evaluation Team The Commonwealth Government. (Insert additional rows as necessary) Evaluation Framework The evaluation framework is an extremely important aspect for the successful completion of the evaluation program. The Evaluation framework is the basic blueprint of the study which helps in managing the evaluation and driving it towards achieving the deliverables of the evaluation program. The evaluation framework is important as it helps to highlight the rationale and design summary and the evaluation approach effectively which helps the evaluation. The main purpose of this evaluation program is to achieve the stated objectives and research questions involved with the evaluation that is to understand the impact of the drug trial and its results which would help the key stakeholders involved in the evaluation program to make sure they can use the results properly for their own good (Posavac, 2015). The evaluation framework involves planning which helps to effectively go about the job of evaluation effectively. In this case the planning is done where ultimately the time duration of t he project evaluation has been fixed, the sample populace has been fixed the clear strategies have been developed which would help to move about the project properly. The evaluation framework deals with the approach and the rationale of the project that has been taken to evaluate in order to understand its overall impact and whether it is effective enough to make the decision to continue the intervention strategy. In this case it is important to note that the evaluation program is focused on drug test trial which is mainly done to understand how people living under welfare system are misusing the money given to them. Hence it could be said that the study becomes extremely effective since it provides significant data which would help to make effective assumption and develop stronger strategy for rehabilitation and counselling of the job seekers and individuals addicted to alcohol and drugs (Brinkerhoff et al., 2012). This is one kind of health control program and hence it is importan t to move effectively with time to manage the program effectively in order to get the best possible result from the evaluation. The present evaluation will help to get long term information about drug abuse and alcohol addiction which would help to overhaul the welfare payment system and help to make the use of the fund effective and suitable for the youths. The effective evaluation findings will help to develop proper intervention and rehabilitation strategy for the youths involved in drug abuse and alcohol (Venable, Pries-Heje and Baskerville, 2012). The evaluation approach is an extremely important as it will help to move towards effective completion of the health evaluation program. There are several types of evaluation which are adopted by the evaluation team. This evaluation approach will mainly focus on using outcome evaluation approach which would help to make sure the outcome of the program is effective. The outcome evaluation of the drug test trial will help the authority to effectively understand the results of the evaluation and manage them effectively in the long run. The outcome of the evaluation helps to develop appropriate measures that will help to make changes in the health conditions, quality of life and behaviours. It will also focus on assessing the impact of the program on the participants. The appropriate measures include changes in awareness, knowledge, attitudes, behaviours and skills. The impact evaluation of the project will be developed with the help of the impact based accountability model which would h elp to develop a strong methodology and logic structure for the program (Brinkerhoff et al., 2012). It is important to note that in the present evaluation approach the evaluation will be done with the help of formative and summative evaluation technique which would help to develop better intervention strategies and accordingly. The formative techniques will help to get suitable insights from the entire evaluation and effectively manage the process and findings for the evaluation which is effective for the completion of the evaluation. The formative assessment will help to provide insights to the authorities and the other stakeholders that would help to make sure the long term objectives are met and the healthcare intervention strategies are developed properly. The evaluation will also be systematic and will take an opportunity to involve the participants effectively to make sure they are used to good effect in order to get the right kind of information from them regarding drug abuse and keep them under observation and continuously apply the trial on them to get progress report as well as the final drug test trial report effectively. Overall it could be said that the drug trial test will be effective for the evaluation team to get the desired outcomes to analyse the impact of the trial (Venable, Pries-Heje and Baskerville, 2012). (What framework will be used to guide the evaluation? If a Program Logic approach is used, insert the diagram or append as an Attachment. If another framework approach is to be used please insert diagram below.) Information and Collection (Detail the information and collection requirements below. Note: all information collected should link to the Core Evaluation Question/s to be addressed) Core evaluation question to address Information required Information sources Data collection and analysis How many people in the sample are addicted to drug and alcohol?(Specify The Core Evaluation Question/s to be addressed by the evaluation as listed in Section 2.3) Personal and drug addiction information.(List the subsets of information required to answer the Core Evaluation Questions) Sample populace chosen for the study. (What are sources for the information? E.g., from employees, clients, project/program/iniative documentation, etc.) Data collection will be done with qualitative depth interview and program observation. On the other hand analysis will be done with the help of thematic analysis.(What are the best methods to employ in data collection and analysis? E.g., questionnaires, interviews, examining documentation etc.) Is the evaluation effective enough? Information about the efficacy of the program evaluation. Regular progress reports Statistical analysis of the trends showed by the progress reports. Is the time duration of the study suitable? Information on visible changes through observation. Program observation Results and process evaluation (Venable, Pries-Heje and Baskerville, 2012). (Insert additional rows as necessary) Budget and Staff Resources Effective budgeting and staff resourcing is important for the effective implementation of the process so that the impact of the evaluation could be properly analysed. The staffs are extremely important stakeholders in the evaluation plan as they do the basic work of evaluation. In the present evaluation plan the third party service providers will be involved where there will be at least 20 staffs that will be taking care of the evaluation program. On the other hand the staffs of the department of human resources will have supervisory staffs working in the evaluation program for the effective application of the project. A group of 10 medical professionals will be used for the program which would help to get real time information about the drug test trial and will help to make sure the insights are effective enough for the impact evaluation of the drug test trial applied on the 5000 respondents. Even though the cost of the entire measurement program has not been published but it could be said that for the two years of the drug test trial application on the job seekers living under welfare payment will be approximately US$85000. This will include the remuneration and funds for the other key services provided by the medical professionals, the remuneration of the other supervisory staffs and the payment to the third party service providers (Dy and Purnell, 2012). Overall it could be said that this is likely to include the rehab and intervention programs of the job seekers addicted to drugs as well. (Specify the funding and human resource capacity for the evaluation. Include materials, travel, external evaluators etc.) e(Insert additional rows as necessary) Evaluation Staff Roles and Responsibilities The core team of evaluation will be responsible to apply the evaluation procedure on the respondents in this case 5000 job seekers who are living under welfare payments. It is important to note that the main role of the Accountable officer that is the head of the evaluation team is to manage the team members of the core evaluation team and allocate suitable roles to each and every member of the team. The evaluation team members are extremely important in the context of the program evaluation since they are responsible to collect the sample of the respondents for the drug test namely like the sample for the Ice test, hair follicle samples, urine sample and saliva tests and bring them to the respective Medical professional for the effective completion of the program. The third party service providers are allocated the job of constantly doing the tests and also to observe the samples for observation results and the Human resource supervisory staffs will be responsible for the overall su pervision of the entire evaluation program. Hence to conclude it could be said that the different groups of employees if doesnt do their respective work the project wouldnt be successful as it will not get the desired result from the evaluation program (Jones et al., 2013). (Identify the roles and responsibilities of the Evaluation Team members) Time Schedule (What are the major timelines, key activities and milestones for the evaluation?) Major milestones Due date Consultation with Evaluation Services regarding support and approval process for the evaluation 1st month of the starting of the project. Jan 2018 Program Logic Model (or evaluation framework) generated February 2018 to April 2018 Evaluation Governance Group established with endorsed Terms of Reference May to June (2018) Draft Evaluation Proposal presented to Evaluation Governance Group for feedback June to August (2018) Evaluation Proposal endorsed by Evaluation Governance Group August to September (2018) Evaluation Proposal approved by Evaluation Steering Committee September to October (2018) Consultant contracted (if applicable) or Evaluation Team appointed Progress Report to Evaluation Steering Committee (October to November (2018) Data gathering and analysis complete November to March (2018-2019) Progress Report to Evaluation Steering Committee March to May (2019) Draft Evaluation Report presented to Evaluation Governance Group for feedback May to June (2019) Draft Evaluation Report endorsed by Evaluation Governance Group June to August (2019) Final Evaluation Report approved by Evaluation Steering Committee August to October (2019) Brief with any recommendations to the Policy and Performance Committee with any recommendations October to January (2019-2020) (Insert additional rows as necessary) References Brinkerhoff, R.O., Brethower, D.M., Nowakowski, J. and Hluchyj, T. eds., 2012.Program evaluation: A practitioners guide for trainers and educators(Vol. 2). Springer Science Business Media. Dusetzina, S.B., Higashi, A.S., Dorsey, E.R., Conti, R., Huskamp, H.A., Zhu, S., Garfield, C.F. and Alexander, G.C., 2012. Impact of FDA drug risk communications on health care utilization and health behaviors: a systematic review.Medical care,50(6), p.466. Dy, S.M. and Purnell, T.S., 2012. Key concepts relevant to quality of complex and shared decision-making in health care: a literature review.Social science medicine,74(4), pp.582-587. Jones, K.J., Skinner, A.M., High, R. and Reiter-Palmon, R., 2013. A theory-driven, longitudinal evaluation of the impact of team training on safety culture in 24 hospitals.BMJ Qual Saf, pp.bmjqs-2012. Kris-Etherton, P.M., Akabas, S.R., Bales, C.W., Bistrian, B., Braun, L., Edwards, M.S., Laur, C., Lenders, C.M., Levy, M.D., Palmer, C.A. and Pratt, C.A., 2014. The need to advance nutrition education in the training of health care professionals and recommended research to evaluate implementation and effectiveness.The American journal of clinical nutrition,99(5), pp.1153S-1166S. Luce, B.R. and Elixhauser, A., 2012.Standards for the economics evaluation of health care services. Springer Science Business Media. Oleske, D.M., 2014.Epidemiology and the delivery of health care services. Springer. Posavac, E., 2015.Program evaluation: Methods and case studies. Routledge. Taylor, M.J., McNicholas, C., Nicolay, C., Darzi, A., Bell, D. and Reed, J.E., 2013. Systematic review of the application of the plandostudyact method to improve quality in healthcare.BMJ Qual Saf, pp.bmjqs-2013. Venable, J., Pries-Heje, J. and Baskerville, R., 2012, May. A comprehensive framework for evaluation in design science research. InInternational Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems(pp. 423-438). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)